Repost from Mashable: Putting Social Media Monetization in “Context”

Reposting an old article that I wrote for Mashable…Reposting it here for context 🙂

—–

In his post on why the traditional CPM model doesn’t work anymore, Dave McClure breaks the CPM denial balloon, noting that the popular content-centric, keyword-based Google Adword model delivers a click-through rate of less than 1%. Dave posits that the problem is not Google-specific, but reflects the problem with the CPM model in the new world of social networks and distributed conversations.

As an answer to the problem with lackluster clicks, especially within social networks like Facebook, Dave looks to widgets to serve up content based on the interests of individuals:

“The Revolution Will Not Be Televised. It will be Widgetized. Fortunately, that revolution is already happening… it’s called widgets. and Facebook apps. it’s about engaging users via application workflow, and discovering intent. then you don’t have to advertise anymore, you just serve up the stuff that users find interesting.”

Social Networks

What’s clear is that while the appeal of social networks is growing — with 44.3% of U.S. Internet users expected to participate by year’s end according to eMarketer — the CPM model as a means to evoke a response from consumers is not just flailing, but failing.

Ad networks like Lookery, which target Facebook users, have cut ad rates nearly in half. It’s a move that has worked for Lookery in the short term—at least in providing relief to frustrated application developers.

However, cutting ad rates is not exactly the hallmark of a solid revenue model. These guarantees are more like a Band-Aid than the full-scale surgery that is required of online advertising.

Why CPMs Don’t Work

The reason CPMs don’t work in social networks is that they are trying to target new media users using old media technology and thinking. The CPM model asks, “What is the content on the page?” But social media conversations aren’t ON any one page anymore. They jump from one site to another, they take place on a variety of platforms and media types, across blogs and Twitter and FriendFeed and Facebook and MySpace.

In this AdAge article, Steve Rubel talks about the role of social search in the changing role of online advertising:

“Social-network advertising to date… has been a mixed bag. Everyone is innovating, but the draw on social networks is your group of friends. That makes it harder to be distracted by ads. Enter search. Watch for contextual advertising and programs such as Facebook’s social ads. New models will emerge where social algorithms and keywords trigger contextual ads.”

Finding a Solution

It’s clear that a solution to the social media monetization puzzle cannot be solved by content alone. Tools that track the context within which the social media participant engages within various communities are important. Context-based discovery and social search play a role in bringing relevant content to receptive audiences. Interest-based user engagement — based on user context, not content -– tracks interest across various conversations and among the plethora of social media sites.

Knowing – based on her participation across social sites – that a social media participant is a New England Patriots fan who vacations frequently in Hawaii and loves water sports and high-tech gadgets is invaluable to creating a tailored interaction between that participant and companies with offers that are relevant to her.

Universal Profiles

Universal user profiles can inform and strengthen the relationship between social media users, third-party application developers, and advertisers. In contrast to the fragmented identities we maintain in all of the social sites we participate on, universal profiles present a hyperlinked record of users’ participation across sites.

Universal profiles have supercharged the idea of “context” as it relates to the distributed Web, offering the best of both worlds. These profiles track and present the activity of users across communities, while leaving control of the data in the hands of the community or site owner. They are proving to increase traffic for site owners while providing the community with non-intrusive ways to monetize content and build reputation.

This context-based approach to social media advertising offers a creative, secure way to breathe new life into an old model. With a new way to seamlessly present meaningful offers, and even customized environments, to users, advertisers can now understand and appeal to an individual’s online and offline interests based on the fullness of their participation across social media sites. Greeting users on their own terms –- rather than force-feeding them ads based on key words and content — can, over time, transform Internet users from “mouse clicks” and “targets” to fully engaged participants and willing customers.

As founder and CEO of SezWho, Jitendra Gupta brings 13 years of experience in developing and managing software solutions. He holds an MBA from the University of and a B.Tech in EE from IIT Kanpur, India. Jitendra speaks frequently on the topic of context-based search, distributed conversations, and the changing nature of the social web. He has been blogging for nearly two years and occasionally contributes to ReadWriteWeb.com. Jitendra can be reached at jitendra [at] jitendragupta [dot] com.

Is a brand a person?

Interesting take from Tom Foremski that illustrates the issues marketers are grappling with in social media.

Corporate Social Media Marketing: I Don’t Want A Social Relationship With My Hard Drive 

It highlights some of the difficulty with making money in social media. We will explore some more related issues in the next few posts.

Twitter, twitter, twitter…

After my little break I have just started catching up on things. One thing that seems to happened in my absence is that Twitter seems to have taken over the social media landscape. Everyday there is a new update on twitter – a new feature, a new stat about the number of users or a new celebrity story.

I do think that Twitter is a great app (I have been using it for over a year now)  – beautifully designed and thought out – but things are getting a wee bit hysterical with all the hype. The reason for all this hype seems to be that twitter is really targeted to media personalities – to people who make money from influencing other people and are comfortable in the spotlight – and these people are the ones doing all the hyping. Imagine news written by students…It will be all facebook all the time.

Now is twitter really useful or popular with non-media types? If you are not looking to influence other people, does it makes sense to tweet? Can twitter provide value to students or plumbers or nurses? If you just want to talk with your friends or connect with a group, I just don’t see the value proposition being very strong. There are better tools like facebook, myspace etc. that provide much better tools and access control for your conversation.

Another angle that is getting hyped up is the real-time search.  A number of people seem to be suggesting that Twitter = Real-time Search. To me twitter is an important source of information for real-time search but its not real-time search. For my real-time search I would like to get a larger data set that includes information from facebook feed, LinkedIn, myspace, blogs, bulletin boards recently updated sites etc. Now given the current stage of search (Google) this kind of near real-time access to latest information is not available. Perhaps that is why Twitter with its real-time database that does not require any extensive crawling and indexing works as a proxy real-time search. Longer term, though, saying twitter is real-time search seems similar to saying yahoo directory (from 10-12 years back) was the internet. Remember how that worked out for Yahoo!.

Update: Check out this interesting post from MediaPost that echos some of the same sentiments.

Update: Check out this interesting post from Brian Solis’s blog (Brian has been an early adopter of twitter and is a passionate user)

Observations from India

We just got back from an extended break in India. Some observations:

1. Election buzz is everywhere in India.

2. North India seems to be a whole lot more engaged in the elections compared to the south.

3. Roads, railways and airlines infrastucture is much improved in India…Now if they can solve the last mile problem for travel.

4. In the villages, a lot more people are excercising these days. Over a number of trips, I saw kids from villages and cities alike, getting up early in the morning and running on the roads, parks and streets. Gone are the days when I used to be the only person running. People and dogs no longer look at you with interest, if you are running. Very welcome change.

5. Yoga has taken off in India. All my relatives are all over it. Based on some convincing testimonials I decided to attend a yoga camp as well. 

Yoga is really focused on exercising the internal organs of the body and it really works. Interesting that all the voice training exercise for singers in the west are practically copied from Yoga (here, here etc.).

6. Lucknow is the place to go for authentic kababs. The kabab’s are called tunde kabab’s are somewhat like aloo tikkies and are served with special parathas  and roomali rotis. All I can say is yum!!! (check out the video of the scene of crime). 

7. Olive oil is still hard to find in India. In a superstore in Pilani, where the owner insisted that they had olive oil, I finally located it in the hair oil section. Apparently the shop owner believes that the only possible use of olive oil is for hair care. 

8. IPL cricket is doing really well this year despite being in South Africa. Its and interesting mixture of sports and entertainment with bollywood stars as owners of teams (great investment buying a team btw). There is even a gossip blogger for the IPL now. 

preity-zinta-ipl-pics-9

9. DVR’s and HD TV are finally available in India and they work good. 

10. Credit cards are accepted pretty much everywhere in cities these days…Not so much in towns and villages. (Not one store accepting credit card in Pilani e.g.)

How much is your privacy worth?

Fascinating post on MSNBC about the price users put on Privacy…The post talks about experiments where users were asked how much they value their private data. Customers were asked the question in two ways:

  • How much are customer willing to pay to protect their privacy?
  • How much do customers want to be paid to share their private information?

As expected customers wanted a whole lot more money to share their private information while very few were willing to pay to anything to protect that information. I think people have this assumption about privacy that its something they just have…and I think its an artifact of how things used to be before everything changed because of technology. We now need to reexamine our assumptions about how much we really value privacy and come up with a more rational value (rather then have endowment effect and other psychological factors skew our judgement) … This is too important for everybody.